Archive for the ‘War On Terra Firma’ Category

Would that it were

Sunday, August 23rd, 2009

So I was doing a bit of drunken-Twitter-trolling:

Even if Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi was guilty, 180 of the people he topped were American and hence don’t count #anywayhewasnt

Of the remainder, 79 were non-Yanks who chose to fly on a Yank airline, and hence clearly of unsound mind #anywayhewasnt

On the other hand, killing 11 innocent Scots is still quite a bad thing to do #anywayhewasnt

At this point, Hungbunny won all of the internets and more, and almost drove me to give up trying to be funny about politics forever, with:

Unless it’s the national football team

Popularity: 21% [?]

It doesn’t matter *who* shoots the civilians

Sunday, May 17th, 2009

I’ve finally got around to reading Craig Murray’s The Catholic Orangemen of Togo. Brief book review: it’s fucking excellent; buy it; read it.

However, I don’t quite understand Craig’s, and indeed many other people’s, obsession with ‘mercenaries’. For example:

For me, the really scary thing about [a video where private security company Aegis shot a civilian car in Iraq that drove through a checkpoint] is that it was the subject of a formal United States Army enquiry, which says that the incidents shown were “within standard operating procedures”, as laid down by the US Army, which in effect give Aegis the right to shoot up any car approaching them, in case it is a car bomb.

Aegis were working for the US Army. If Aegis hadn’t been there, then Yank soldiers would have be there, operating to the same rulebook and shooting the same poor buggers who missed the checkpoint. It doesn’t matter in the fucking slightest whether the chaps with guns shooting cars are scared American 21-year-olds or skint, retired-vet South African 45-year-olds, except to the extent that scared troops are more prone to make terrible mistakes than less-scared troops.

The problem is the fucking rulebook that says you can shoot a carload of civilians on suspicion – and suggesting the problem is down to the contractors who do the same bloody thing as the real army is a meaningless cop-out.

Popularity: 28% [?]

Newspapers make BNP cunts happy

Monday, December 1st, 2008

5cc has a quality piece about the random, made-up lie that the Mumbai terrorists were brown British gentlemen, the tabloids’ insane fixation thereon, and their complete non-denial when it turned out to be bollocks.

Fantastic. So we’ve turned an actual “Pakistan’s secret service does vile murder against Indians, as they’ve done non-stop for the last 50 years; film at 11″ story into a made-up “the darkies will rise up and slaughter us in our beds” story. That’ll surely help with racial tension everywhere…

Popularity: 10% [?]

Despicable arseholes; I hope they get blown up

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

This isn’t even funny, it’s pathetic. Either:

a) it’s a lie. Terrorism is irrelevant; it always has been irrelevant; about 1/10,000 the number of people who die annually from smoking may die of it in the UK but really so fucking what; and anyone who’d accept so much as crossing the fucking street to deal with politicians’ gibbering self-important fantasies that it matters is a clueless cuntard; or

b) it’s true. Terrorism is important; the fact that it’s entirely trivial and has never made a blind bit of difference to anyone other than gibbering paranoid morons is irrelevant; the darkies are going to slaughter us all in our beds; and so any government minister who’d tip off said darkies that our brave boys are tracking a Big Scary Terror Gang is a despicable treasonous bastard.

You can’t have it both ways. And even though anyone who didn’t pick a) would be certifiably mad, at least they wouldn’t be as despicably hypocritical as someone who claimed there were options other than a) or b) on offer…

Popularity: 5% [?]

The British Union of Slack-Jawed, Violent Trolls

Tuesday, October 14th, 2008

I’m disappointed my sole BNPite reader left, after I offended him by suggesting that some idiot fuckwits were idiot fuckwits.

Nonetheless, encountering these dim bigoted sods on t’Internet has done a great deal to diffuse my personal version of the horrible, vaguely Current Labour-y stereotype that the Decent Working Classes have all kinds of Serious Reasonable Grievances exacerbated by Illegal Immigrants working to Destroy Our Culture for Unfair Wages, rather than being (e.g.) useless thick cunts, compared to whom even Alf Garnet would sooner employ a Paki or a nigger.

Weirdly, successful, clever, well-adjusted people having a good time with nice lives very seldom fill that bill. Doubtless that’s a Bilderberg conspiracy…

Anyway, the Flying Rodent has a good response to this kind of criticism:

What if support for the far right by ordinary people all over Europe owes less to tyrannical multiculturalism than it does to their cretinous desire to blame all of their personal problems on blacks, PC do-gooders, gays, Poles, criminal-loving lawyers, gypsies and Muslims, to name but a few?

I mean, let’s be honest – when we’re talking about far right politicians, we’re talking about people too stupid to drive cars without smashing them into walls and pulverising themselves into mean-spirited goo.

Quite. Rest in pieces, Mr Haider.

Popularity: 11% [?]

Terror observation

Friday, September 12th, 2008

I hope all my readers had a happy November 9 yesterday.

The thing I found interesting this time round is that this kind of jolly jape (and c’mon, it is) now shows a comments ratio of one grumpy po-faced “I lost my hat in the attacks, you CALLOUS BASTARDS” fuckwit to hundreds of LOLz. Even a couple of years ago you could guarantee a massive flamewar of po-faced cunts versus callous gets; now the callous gets have won. Which is as it should be.

If you lost anyone in the attacks and feel offended by this post, they were probably a wanker anyway, and one of the last things to go through their mind before their demise was almost certainly how glad they’d be to get away from you.

Popularity: 5% [?]

Decentya-smackdown-tastic

Sunday, July 13th, 2008

Alan ‘not the minister’ Johnson writes a puffed-up pompous piece on Iran (summary: “they’re mad bastards and they’re going to kill us all! Time to invade!) using a laboured analogy to Camus’s La Peste.

First comment:

I’ve just remembered that Camus’s most famous novel tells of a man who killed an Arab because of ‘the glare of the sun’, and then shot more bullets into his corpse.

(yes, I know Persians aren’t Arab. Fuck off…)

Popularity: 12% [?]

I have no idea whether this story is true

Thursday, June 5th, 2008

…but it’s certainly worth reading.

Tags: really fucking depressing

Popularity: 6% [?]

Top sekrit covert ops

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

a) George Bush is a fucking tool
b) George Bush is coming to the UK
c) This is a Bad Thing
d) Manticore!!

Popularity: 9% [?]

Bombing conspiraloons, again

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

Just noticed this old-ish thread on Rachel’s site (I linked to the post at the time, but the comments have sprawled somewhat since then).

Antipholus Papps, sometime of this parish, makes a pretty reasonable point (and gets utterly crucified by self-righteous cunts for his pains):

the reason that some people question what happened on 7 July 2005 is down to the government being a bunch of lying murderous bastards who start wars on false premises.

NB if you’re as stupid as some of the respondents in the original thread, you might take this as implying that either the bombings were excused by the Iraq war, or that they were done by the government. He isn’t saying that.

He’s saying that since the government have lied about more or less everything, particularly regarding evidence of Terrorism and Evil Stuff, to disbelieve their narrative concerning the biggest example of Terrorism and Evil Stuff we’ve seen domestically is hardly unreasonable.

Now, as Rachel’s original piece makes clear, the government has released credible evidence that the July 7 bombings were indeed carried out by the four people reported as carrying them out, for the purposes for which they were reported as carrying them out. So, as I’ve said elsewhere, people who continue to believe the conspiracy narrative are daft cunts.

But this evidence was released in the conspiracy trials that took place in spring 2008 – which means that there was a period of nearly three years where accepting that the July 7 bombings took place as reported meant uncritically believing the words of people who are known to lie about This Sort Of Thing.

I don’t know about you, but I’m reluctant to blame anyone for their historical reluctance to uncritically believe the words of liars…

Popularity: 4% [?]