Filed under The rozzers

Why the fuck have we regressed to the level of six-year-olds?

When a child complains excessively about some injustice, a good parent’s response will generally include the maxim that “life isn’t fair”. Because it isn’t: through the sheer workings of bad luck, bad things happen to people who don’t deserve them.

And even if the relevant bad thing could have been averted if someone else had acted differently, this doesn’t move the relevant act from being a horrible accident to the second person being morally responsible for the bad thing.

Unfortunately, although anyone with an age and/or IQ over ten is aware of these maxims, The Authorities increasingly aren’t. One obvious recent example is the utterly appalling decision to impose prison sentences for causing death by careless driving. This does not mean getting blind drunk and then driving at 150mph, or even driving while eating a sandwich. It means driving like most drivers do most of the time, but being unlucky enough to have been caught up in a fatal accident that would not have happened if you’d driven better than most drivers do most of the time.

Another is the sad-but-really-really-fucking-obviously-accidental death of Vietnamese student Vu Quang Hoang Tu. Some teenage boys were messing around on a Tube platform, chasing each other around; one fell over as a train entered the station; the boy fell into Mr Tu (or possibly Mr Vu – sorry, I can’t remember which way round Vietnamese names go); both went under the train. Mr Tu died; the boy survived with serious injuries.

In saner times, this would have been viewed as a tragic accident (and possibly as the basis for a gory Public Information Film). Since we live in a society with no concept of bad luck, the boys are currently out on police bail on suspicion of murder. For fuck’s sake…

Yeah but no but

I’m always amused when “community leaders” get hoist by the ‘offensiveness warrants locking up’ petard (fact fans: see also the majority of convictions both ever and in the last five years for incitement to racial hatred. Defendants = not white). I also think that being abusive to a policeman when it’s at his discretion whether or not to book you is a fucking stupid plan.
However, I think that calling some rozzer a white pig isn’t so much racism as a traditional rozzery epiphet, and therefore shouldn’t really count as racist so much as just moronic…

Malicious prosecution

Imagine a 15-year-old boy is caught having taken a video of two kids in his class shagging each other, and having forwarded it on to other classmates. Is the sensible response:

a) a word to the boy and his parents that this isn’t civilised or appropriate behaviour?

b) suspending the boy from school for a while and pointing out that, although it’s easy with modern technology, this kind of thing hurts people and could get him into serious trouble if he keeps it up in later life?

c) prosecuting and convicting the boy for making and distributing child pornography?

If you picked option c, then you’re both an absolute cunt and in line with the Perth and Kinross constabulary and judiciary.

While I expect the rozzers to be cunts, the behaviour of the CPS and courts is more worrying. Anyone care to justify this one?

What’s the best thing about 29-year-olds?

Nourishing Obscurity objects to the Welsh police chief’s reasonably sensible reaction to sexlaws:

Tell me one thing a 13 year old could offer you which a hot 29 year old couldn’t? Tell me how she could sexually and socially satisfy you? Yes, exactly – no demands, does exactly what you want, goes into hysterics afterwards.

Mr Obscurity should be told that there are plenty of 29-year-olds who meet his slightly unusual criteria (since I imagine he’s well over the chief constable’s 20-year-old cut-off, and therefore should probably steer clear of the schoolgirls…).

Conjecture

Rather than worrying about ladies wearing silly outfits (and we’ve been almost as bad as the Dutch about this one lately), we should probably worry more about this kind of thing.

Well-deserved

It’s not often that my attitude towards white chavs goes beyond “bring back the gas chambers”. However, I very much enjoyed their behaviour in this video.

Anyone know a recipe for boiled elephant?

Charlie:

“What individuals want to see is a legal system which correctly finds guilty those who are guilty and acquits those who are innocent, with respect to what they did or did not do rather than whether the legal process was or was not correctly followed.”

The only way I can place an assertion this stupid is in the “we must fight the BNP and Tories without annoying the blacks and the Muslims. What can we say? Oh, wait, let’s just slate ‘criminals’ – everyone disapproves of them, at least until they get wrongfully accused of something, which doesn’t happen *that* often, so the idiots who were thinking of deserting us will be impressed by our Tough On Crime-osity” bracket.

The alternative is that Charlie and therefore Tony believe this shit. And since we’ve got one demonstrable maniac in charge of nuclear weapons, and another possibly about to acquire them (largely to defend himself from the first, but selah), I’d rather our own red-button-holder wasn’t quite that mentalist.

Counter-productive

Setting up a website highlighting the police’s abuse of power is a worthy and creditable thing to do. And I’m as big a fan as anyone of terrible and offensive puns. Nonetheless, I still reckon Pig Brother might fail at preaching to the unconverted…

Nowt so queer as Norfolk

Here are two recent police photofits issued by the Norfolk police – a would-be burglar and a would-be child abductor:

Norfolk burglar photofit

Norfolk abduction photofit

No further comment.