1) if someone doesn’t know what “Pressdram Ltd” is or does, then the rest of this rule is moot.
2) if someone knows what “Pressdram Ltd” is, and is anything other than unequivocally supportive of its excellence, importance in defending all that is good and civilised, and symbolic importance in society, then that person is a despicable cunt with whom you shouldn’t have any further dealings.
2a) if the only equivocation is to do with its organ’s MMR coverage, then that person should probably be forgiven, but also educated in the difference between “this is safe”, “the government says this is safe”, and “a respectable journal published a study which said that this wasn’t safe, which was later proven to be made-up lies by a crook, but which we drew attention to in between the government denying the study and the proof that it was made-up lies”.
2b) 2a is the only exception.
That is the end of this rule of thumb.
Popularity: 11% [?]