Let’s face it two failed prosecutions:

1) CPS dropped the case citing insufficient evidence.

2) Private prosecution where the judge directed the jury to return a ‘not guilty’ verdict on the grounds that the evidence of Duwayne Brooks was unreliable and inadmissible.

Did Mr Norris nobble both the CPS and the judge?

so if you have evidence that ‘local gangsters’ influenced the judge I suggest you contact Scotland Yard to tell them, if not them it seems like a case of the fucktard calling the pot black…

As you nearly say: Unfortunately, the story, of their involvement in Stephen Lawrence’s death, has almost certainly reached urban myth status to the degree that thick cunts everywhere will believe they has something to do with it, despite not having done. Which will almost certainly lead to more mistrust, hatred and violence between thick black/letfy cunts and the normal English working class. Which is what the BBC/Guardian/Labour party wanted in the first place… so of course they don’t give a fuck that the evidence was made up all along…

Neil Acourt, then 17, and Luke Knight, who was 16, who were initially charged with murder but the Crown Prosecution Service dropped the case on 29 July 1993, citing insufficient evidence

Charges against the original two suspects were dropped before the trial due to lack of evidence, and the three remaining suspects were acquitted at trial when the judge ruled that the identification evidence given by Duwayne Brooks was inadmissible.

…

Seriously: T-minus how long for this one to float up and break the greasy surface of the NFosphere, what with this being Year of the China Bash and all?