Kebab cannibal murder update: it was all bollocks

If you’re a BNP fuckwit, you may have been spending the last year or so spreading the myth that Muslim chaps kidnap white girls and turn them into kebabs. Indeed, you may have been doing so in the comments section of this blog, citing a leak from anonymous Blackpool police sources to the local paper about an ongoing criminal investigation as their ‘evidence’.

If you’re not a BNP fuckwit, it will come as no surprise to you to learn that said ongoing criminal investigation concluded with the acquital of all defendants, ordered by the judge on the basis that the police’s evidence was riddled with lies.

Unfortunately, the story has almost certainly reached urban myth status to the degree that thick cunts everywhere will believe it happened somewhere, despite not having done. Which will almost certainly lead to more mistrust, hatred and violence between thick white cunts and the Saracen hordes. Which is what the BNP wanted in the first place… so of course they don’t give a fuck that the story was made up all along…

Update: for the avoidance of doubt, I’m happy to point out that there were no public communications made from BNP central office regarding this case. But if the people spreading the rumours weren’t BNP supporters, then mine’s a large hat doner…

9 thoughts on “Kebab cannibal murder update: it was all bollocks

  1. Jim Bliss says:

    And apparently Jews don’t eat Christian babies either. Who’d have thunk it?

  2. pdf says:

    I know, crazy isn’t it? next they’ll be saying that africans in the uk don’t sacrifice babies for witchcraft…

  3. Neil says:

    Ah, but the Chinese round up and fry all the neighbourhood cats and dogs in a big wok. That’s, true that is.

    Seriously: T-minus how long for this one to float up and break the greasy surface of the NFosphere, what with this being Year of the China Bash and all?

  4. I did a gig in Stratford (east London) last night and afterwards got drawn into a conversation with a cockney bloke and his Caribbean wife, about why they were both voting BNP! Strange days indeed.

  5. TL says:

    Yes a remarkably similar conclusion to the infamous ‘witch hunting’ of Gary Dobson, Neil Acourt, Jamie Acourt, Luke Knight, and David Norris.

    As you nearly say: Unfortunately, the story, of their involvement in Stephen Lawrence’s death, has almost certainly reached urban myth status to the degree that thick cunts everywhere will believe they has something to do with it, despite not having done. Which will almost certainly lead to more mistrust, hatred and violence between thick black/letfy cunts and the normal English working class. Which is what the BBC/Guardian/Labour party wanted in the first place… so of course they don’t give a fuck that the evidence was made up all along…

    Neil Acourt, then 17, and Luke Knight, who was 16, who were initially charged with murder but the Crown Prosecution Service dropped the case on 29 July 1993, citing insufficient evidence

    Charges against the original two suspects were dropped before the trial due to lack of evidence, and the three remaining suspects were acquitted at trial when the judge ruled that the identification evidence given by Duwayne Brooks was inadmissible.

  6. PDF says:

    Hmm. Are you saying that the acquited alleged kebabists are related to local gangsters who leant on the witnesses to not testify in their trial, and that’s the only reason they were acquitted? If so, then you’re right that there’s a similarity between the cases. If not, then you’re a fucktard.

  7. TL says:

    the judge ruled that the identification evidence given by Duwayne Brooks was inadmissible

    so if you have evidence that ‘local gangsters’ influenced the judge I suggest you contact Scotland Yard to tell them, if not them it seems like a case of the fucktard calling the pot black…

  8. PDF says:

    Don’t be a daft cunt; that’s not what I’m implying. If you know anything about the case, you’ll know Brooks was the only witness left, because Norris’s dad intimidated everyone else into not testifying.

  9. TL says:

    Amazing, 13 years later and Norris’s dad’s intimidation still has a hold over the so-called ‘witneses’…

    Let’s face it two failed prosecutions:

    1) CPS dropped the case citing insufficient evidence.

    2) Private prosecution where the judge directed the jury to return a ‘not guilty’ verdict on the grounds that the evidence of Duwayne Brooks was unreliable and inadmissible.

    Did Mr Norris nobble both the CPS and the judge?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>