Comments on: In which satire is misunderstood http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/ Fuck you in the arse and the eye Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:24:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: CBass http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-22092 CBass Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:35:17 +0000 http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-22092 Proof that Boris Johnson is, as the scouser said, a Dickhead (why don't they use a still of the bewigged cock on a bike as their intro?) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdU9Ju9gRqI Proof that Boris Johnson is, as the scouser said, a Dickhead (why don’t they use a still of the bewigged cock on a bike as their intro?)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdU9Ju9gRqI

]]> By: Larry Teabag http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-22051 Larry Teabag Sun, 20 Apr 2008 02:45:56 +0000 http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-22051 <em>Brooker is intolerant of Tories and is, therefore, a bigot.</em> Whereas DK is tolerant to a fault of Labourites, Lib-dems, socialists, etc., and is therefore not a bigot. Or a hypocrite. Christ. Let's just say that post isn't the finest thing he's ever written. Brooker is intolerant of Tories and is, therefore, a bigot.

Whereas DK is tolerant to a fault of Labourites, Lib-dems, socialists, etc., and is therefore not a bigot. Or a hypocrite. Christ. Let’s just say that post isn’t the finest thing he’s ever written.

]]> By: Falco http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21825 Falco Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:23:33 +0000 http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21825 I apologise fucking profusely for the use of "dog dirt" rather than "dog shit/poo/etc" but I happened to like the cunting alliteration, you cunt. As for the bollocks about Guppy, just because the ES would run an equivalent story about Ken does not mean that I would agree with it or be impressed by the journalistic standards. I don't like Ken, I disagree with much of his political philosophy, believe him to be corrupt and think it is time for him to go. Despite this if someone made shit up about him that I knew to be untrue I would, as you know perfectly fucking well, defend him on that specific point. My point about Brooker was simply that he has closed off his mind completely about the tories. I am not keen on them at the moment because they are very much against many policies that I believe to be important but if they changed their views I would reconsider. The tories could support everything that Brooker believes in and have halos coming out of their arses and he still wouldn't vote for them. That's what is fucking stupid about the point of his I quoted. I apologise fucking profusely for the use of “dog dirt” rather than “dog shit/poo/etc” but I happened to like the cunting alliteration, you cunt.

As for the bollocks about Guppy, just because the ES would run an equivalent story about Ken does not mean that I would agree with it or be impressed by the journalistic standards. I don’t like Ken, I disagree with much of his political philosophy, believe him to be corrupt and think it is time for him to go. Despite this if someone made shit up about him that I knew to be untrue I would, as you know perfectly fucking well, defend him on that specific point.

My point about Brooker was simply that he has closed off his mind completely about the tories. I am not keen on them at the moment because they are very much against many policies that I believe to be important but if they changed their views I would reconsider. The tories could support everything that Brooker believes in and have halos coming out of their arses and he still wouldn’t vote for them. That’s what is fucking stupid about the point of his I quoted.

]]> By: PDF http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21818 PDF Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:35:02 +0000 http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21818 Yes, OK, allowed. Yes, OK, allowed.

]]> By: Jim Bliss http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21817 Jim Bliss Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:33:38 +0000 http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21817 Actually, it's not an Irish colloquialism. It was a phrase used by a Saudi Arabian engineer who worked on a project I was managing in Riyadh. His previous contract had been at a sewage-treatment plant where they used the term "sludge" to describe the incoming effluent. He assumed it was the English word for "shit" and remarked, after a brief visit to England, that he couldn't believe the streets of London had so much "dog sludge" on them. Since then the phrase has become a bit of a private joke. Actually, it’s not an Irish colloquialism. It was a phrase used by a Saudi Arabian engineer who worked on a project I was managing in Riyadh. His previous contract had been at a sewage-treatment plant where they used the term “sludge” to describe the incoming effluent. He assumed it was the English word for “shit” and remarked, after a brief visit to England, that he couldn’t believe the streets of London had so much “dog sludge” on them.

Since then the phrase has become a bit of a private joke.

]]> By: PDF http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21816 PDF Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:05:07 +0000 http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21816 Assuming it's an authentic Irish colloquialism, it can be used by anyone eligible for an Irish passport. Assuming it’s an authentic Irish colloquialism, it can be used by anyone eligible for an Irish passport.

]]> By: Jim Bliss http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21815 Jim Bliss Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:42:16 +0000 http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21815 What about "dog sludge"? What about “dog sludge”?

]]> By: PDF http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21813 PDF Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:36:19 +0000 http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21813 Where are the lies exactly? Everything he says about Boris is true (c'mon, if Ken had come up with the kind of pathetic explanation that Boris gave over the Guppy-reporter-beating, then the ES would run a front-page spread that he was a lying thug whose friends were fraudsters, and you lot would rightly rip him to shreds. And where's the libel suit exactly). Also - if you suggest that you hate a particular bunch of lying scumbags because they were a bunch of lying scumbags when you first became politically aware, and that you'd therefore need to be damn confident that the alternative was worse in order to trust a single word that the lying scumbags say, does not mean you haven't thought about the position. When someone like Falco or DK, who we know hates Gordon Brown with every fibre of his heart and soul, points out that GB is a cunt for [whatever the latest reason is], do we automatically assume the post is ill-thought-out tripe on the grounds that it begins with "Gordon Brown is a shitty shitty cunt and I fucking hate him with every fibre of my heart and soul", or do we read the post while bearing in mind that the writer is unlikely to be wholly objective? If we aren't fuckwits, we do the latter. Finally, anyone who uses pathetic euphemisms like "dog dirt" on this blog from now on gets a permanent ban. It's dog faeces, dog excrement, dog shit or dog poo - I'll even accept dog turd and dog crap - but fuck off with your 'dirt'... Where are the lies exactly? Everything he says about Boris is true (c’mon, if Ken had come up with the kind of pathetic explanation that Boris gave over the Guppy-reporter-beating, then the ES would run a front-page spread that he was a lying thug whose friends were fraudsters, and you lot would rightly rip him to shreds. And where’s the libel suit exactly).

Also – if you suggest that you hate a particular bunch of lying scumbags because they were a bunch of lying scumbags when you first became politically aware, and that you’d therefore need to be damn confident that the alternative was worse in order to trust a single word that the lying scumbags say, does not mean you haven’t thought about the position.

When someone like Falco or DK, who we know hates Gordon Brown with every fibre of his heart and soul, points out that GB is a cunt for [whatever the latest reason is], do we automatically assume the post is ill-thought-out tripe on the grounds that it begins with “Gordon Brown is a shitty shitty cunt and I fucking hate him with every fibre of my heart and soul”, or do we read the post while bearing in mind that the writer is unlikely to be wholly objective? If we aren’t fuckwits, we do the latter.

Finally, anyone who uses pathetic euphemisms like “dog dirt” on this blog from now on gets a permanent ban. It’s dog faeces, dog excrement, dog shit or dog poo – I’ll even accept dog turd and dog crap – but fuck off with your ‘dirt’…

]]> By: Falco http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21812 Falco Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:04:35 +0000 http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21812 What pisses me off about the aforementioned dog dirt of an article is that Brooker has a brain but has clearly chosen not to use it: "I'm genetically predisposed to hate the Tories. It's my default, hard-wired position." Bollocks of the first water showing that he has obviously put sod all thought into his views, preceded by lies and with a side dose of hypocrisy. What a little shitbag. What pisses me off about the aforementioned dog dirt of an article is that Brooker has a brain but has clearly chosen not to use it:

“I’m genetically predisposed to hate the Tories. It’s my default, hard-wired position.”

Bollocks of the first water showing that he has obviously put sod all thought into his views, preceded by lies and with a side dose of hypocrisy. What a little shitbag.

]]> By: Dirty Protest http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21791 Dirty Protest Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:21:49 +0000 http://www.pigdogfucker.com/2008/04/14/in-which-satire-is-misunderstood/#comment-21791 Devil, even from the squalor of our council houses we can still manage to muster hate for the man. Devil, even from the squalor of our council houses we can still manage to muster hate for the man.

]]>