Pigdogfucker

Which dead fighter left this message for his daughter?

“Sweetheart… I’m going to really, really miss you a lot. I’m thinking about it already. Look, I absolutely love you to bits and you have been the happiest thing in my life. You and your mum, absolutely brilliant.

“I don’t know what else to say. I just wish I could have been part of your life, especially these growing up – these next months, they’re really special with you learning to walk and things. I just so much wanted to be with you but I have to do this thing for our future and it will be for the best, in the long run.

“That’s the most important thing…. you’ve got loads of people to look after you and keep and eye on you. And I’m doing what I’m doing for the sake of our country.”

Answer? With a couple of Islam references changed to patriotism references, it was Mohammed Siddique Khan, the total bastard who blew himself on the Underground in July 2005, and persuaded a small bunch of other idiots to do likewise.

But it sounds like any other speech by an articulate man gone to war to kill whomever his leaders told him to kill. I guess the point which needs reinforcing is that there’s nothing weird, wrong or unusual about wanting to die for a cause – fuck, I’m cynical and there are even causes I’d die for. And if you think there’s something weird about wanting to kill others while you do that – then doublefuck, there are courses in human nature that you need.

The bit which is weird about suicide terrorism in the UK is purely and simple that we think of the people who do it as being like us, but they think of us in the same way that British soldiers thought of Germans in WWI, Argie conscripts in the Falklands, Iraqi militiamen today, and so on.

Draw your own conclusions as to why this might be the case. Guardian readers should start from the perspective of George Bush and the Zionist lobby’s desire to slaughter any innocent brown chap that moves; while Daily Mail readers should start from the perspective of the inherent murderousness of the paedophile prophet.

[yes, I know this is based on the same article as the last piece. However, it’s two very different points that really, really, really, really don’t need conflating; this one is rightly incredibly contentious, whereas the other one shouldn’t even need making but does…]

Should you be one of those daft, paranoid cunts who believes [conspiracy theory a to z+n] about July 7, then read this fucking piece and then preferably shut the fuck up.

It is possible (in all honesty I still have my doubts) true that better counter-terrorism intelligence and/or fewer wars abroad and/or less immigration [*] would have prevented the July 7 attacks.

It is not in any doubt whatsoever, and if you doubt it you are as mad as people who believe the earth is flat and made of cheese, that some immature, cocksure, terrified, brainwashed, brave-in-the-wrong-way, maniacs got a car from Leeds to Luton, a train from Luton to Kings Cross, and then variously exploded themselves and 52 innocent people in nearby parts of central London.

[*] yes, this would imply less immigration in 19-fucking-65 when we decided to import Pakistani villages to provide cheap labour in Northern textile mills. Apparently, misguided industrial policy decisions made before race relations was even an academic subject reflect both the dhimmitude of New Labour and the evilness of all immigration and all Muslims ever.

I normally avoid the “I am even madder than Melanie Phillips, but because I am a mad doctor rather than a mad pundit my mad rantings have some spurious credibility” gibberings of Theodore Dalrymple. Unfortunately, the Bystander, who normally doesn’t dignify half-mad neofascism with links, linked to one of his articles, and equally unfortunately I clicked on the fucking thing.

Cuntery A:

While it is possible to argue that failed asylum seekers should be handled in some way other than by sending them to prison (though it is difficult to see what it would be other than de facto imprisonment until their deportation can be arranged), it is misleading to suggest that our prison numbers are swelled to any great extent by such cases.

This is “I’m too posh to be in the BNP, even though I agree with them”-speak for “if you’re some kind of dago that wants to get in our country, you need locked up”. If you agree with it, you should be deported to Somalia with extreme and brutal force, and then be questioned on whether you still agree with it.

Cuntery B:

The vast majority of the alleged abnormalities that have been diagnosed among prisoners are in any case of no explanatory or exculpatory value, and in my view have been made by psychiatrists with a vested interest in expanding their power and their field of activities

This is “hang ‘em and flog ‘em” speak for “if you’re a criminal and you did it because you’re mad, that doesn’t prove that you’re mad, it merely proves that I’m right and you’re a cunt. I have no scientific evidence for this, but it’s a fact”.

Cuntery C:

“The third category of people whom Lord Woolf was for a long time complicit in wrongfully imprisoning, in his own opinion, is that of people who are not dangerous. Here Lord Woolf demonstrates either his total lack of compassion, his utter indifference to the fate of those people who do not live on his private Olympus, or his complete lack of imagination.”

This is actual, plain English for “people should be imprisoned even if they aren’t dangerous”.

What a fucking, fucking appalling, despicable cunt. I’d rather spend time with any one of the people Dalrymple (what a shame Anthony Daniels uses the family name of a worthwhile writer to dignify his bullshit) excoriates than such a pompous, puffed-up buffoon…