Abolish the Post Office; viva the EU!

The Royal Mail is a complete waste of space, time and money. It operates a poor service at an extortionate price, protected from competition by competent people like DHL and FedEx by a legal monopoly.

Why do we tolerate this situation? Apparently, because of our fetish for post offices. Which is weird, because post offices are entirely unnecessary. Benefits can be paid by electronic transfer and stamps purchased from newsagents – the only reason for anyone sane to go to a post office now is because they need to send a parcel that’s not quite big or valuable enough to send by courier.

Now, if you’re an economic illiterate and a socialist (not necessarily the same thing), you’ll probably start bleating about the rural poor. Fair enough, it sucks to be poor, especially if you live in the theme park for rich retirees and richer commuters that is the English countryside. But poor ruralites need transport too – and we don’t deal with that need by running a taxi monopoly that charges the same price for all taxi journeys irrespective of length.

In other words, if we’re worried about the rural poor, we shouldn’t let that concern stop us from breaking the postal monopoly – rather, we should have a free market in mail and, separately, give subsidies to rural households that need them. This has the added advantage of not providing a pointless subsidy to wealthy ruralites.

It’s the same issue as with means-tested benefits versus basic state pensions: why the hell should someone with a £15,000 a year tax-free private pension and a paid-off mortgage on a comedically expensive house that they bought for fuck all get an additional £3,150 from my wages just for being old? If you apply broad-brush subsidy regimes like the Post Office and like the state pension, most of the impact will be to increase inefficiency, and very little will go to help the genuinely needy.

One of the best things about the EU is that it’s seriously opposed to state aid for industry and forces governments to not provide it, even when to do so would be popular. So the fact that it has told the government to reduce the pointless subsidy is excellent news. Weirdly, libertarian Europhobes like the Devil have abandoned their normal principles of hating government waste to eulogize the Post Office and slate the EU; I hope this is just a cynical political move rather than a sign of genuine economic idiocy.

Update: the EU hasn’t actually told the government to reduce the pointless subsidy. It’s an amazing and rare case of Labour doing something good and unpopular without external prompting…

6 thoughts on “Abolish the Post Office; viva the EU!

  1. Neil says:

    I’d be in broad agreement if it weren’t for the words ‘competent’, ‘DHL’ and ‘Fed Ex’ appearing in the same sentence. They’re all shit, all of them, believe me. I think the bar is pretty low, though.

  2. Steve says:

    But what about the joyful experience of visiting the Post Office and chatting with all the other rosy-cheeked rural types?

  3. Jez says:

    Buy your stamps at the newsagents? You’d better only need 1st or 2nd class stamps, then. Anything else and you’re stuffed. Most newsagents look at you as if you’re from a different planet if you ask for stamps for Europe.

  4. Neil says:

    And speaking of the Royal Mail being shit, here in the Online Retail industry we’re having terrible trouble getting orders to customers in time for Christmas on account of the fog.

    So congratulations to the Royal Mail (and EWS) for taking the mail taken *off* the fog-immune mode of transport and onto the fog-prone ones a few years back. Top work fellas!

  5. I also have to scoff at the description “competent” for DHL/Fed-Ex et al. I tried to get something sent to the Lloyd’s building the other week and it got returned because whichever firm it was couldn’t find the address.

    It’s the fucking LLOYD’s BUILDING; 250ft tall, famous London landmark, mentioned in every book on architecture and modern design since it was built and marked as “Lloyd’s” on the A-Z.

    Retards.

  6. pdf says:

    Remind me to sign off more work emails with “Retards”. I’m reasonably convinced the “t is next to g” excuse will work…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>